• 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:性别确认乳房切除术(GAM)可改善跨性别和非双性恋(TGNB)个体的心理社会功能和生活质量。然而,围手术期通常以情绪压力为标志,对手术结果的担忧,和身体不适。虽然住院手术提供了与患者互动和教育的多种机会,门诊手术,比如GAM,由于患者术后随访<24小时,因此构成了独特的挑战。鉴于TGNB个体经常经历的与性别焦虑相关的情绪和心理困扰加剧,解决这些差距可以显着改善结果。这项研究旨在表征该人群中与患者发起的沟通(PIC)频率相关的患者和手术特征。方法:对2018年2月至2022年11月接受GAM的TGNB患者进行单中心回顾性分析。人口统计,手术特点,记录围手术期PIC的频率和原因(手术前后30天)。主要结果是围手术期PIC的发生率。次要结果包括(1)PIC的基本原理和(2)患者和与PIC相关的手术特征。结果:共纳入352例患者。其中,285(74.6%)在围手术期开始沟通,总共659个PIC。中位年龄为25.0岁(四分位距[IQR]:9.0)。中位体重指数(BMI)为28.5(IQR:8.5)kg/m2。术前平均PIC数为0.7±1.3,术后为1.3±1.7(p<0.001)。术前PIC受试者最常见的是行政问题(AI;n=66,30.7%),术前要求(n=43,20.0%),以及成本和保险(n=33,15.0%)。术后最常见的PIC受试者是伤口护理(n=77,17.3%),AI(n=70,15.0%),活动限制(n=60,13.5%),排水量(n=56,12.6%),和肿胀(n=37,8.3%)。总的来说,老年患者(β=0.234,p=0.001),有重度抑郁症或广泛性焦虑症病史的人(2.4±3.0vs.1.7±1.9;p=0.019),和那些没有术后引流(n=16/17,94.1%vs.n=236/334,70.7%;p=0.025)从事更高水平的PIC。其他患者特征之间没有显著关联,围手术期细节,或并发症和PIC频率。结论:围手术期PIC在我们机构的大多数GAM患者中普遍存在,随着年龄,精神病诊断,术后引流使用被确定为重要的预测因素。为了减轻PIC频率,确保足够的支持人员和提供全面的术后指导至关重要,特别是关于活动限制和排水管理。这些干预措施可能会减少高容量中心的PIC。进一步的研究应探讨有针对性的干预措施,以进一步支持TGNB患者围手术期。
    Background: Gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) improves the psychosocial functioning and quality of life of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals. However, the perioperative period is often marked by emotional stress, concerns about surgical outcomes, and physical discomfort. While inpatient procedures provide multiple opportunities to engage with and educate patients, outpatient surgeries, such as GAM, pose a unique challenge as patients are followed for <24 h postoperatively. Given the heightened emotional and psychological distress related to gender dysphoria TGNB individuals often experience, addressing these gaps can significantly improve outcomes. This study aims to characterize patient and surgical characteristics associated with patient-initiated communication (PIC) frequency in this population. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of TGNB patients undergoing GAM from February 2018 to November 2022 was conducted. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and frequency of and reasons for perioperative PIC (30 days before and after surgery) were recorded. The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative PIC. The secondary outcomes included (1) the rationale for PIC and (2) patient and surgical characteristics associated with PIC. Results: A total of 352 patients were included. Of these, 285 (74.6%) initiated communication in the perioperative period, totaling 659 PICs. The median age was 25.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.0) years. The median body mass index (BMI) was 28.5 (IQR: 8.5) kg/m2. The mean number of PICs was 0.7 ± 1.3 preoperatively and 1.3 ± 1.7 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The most frequent preoperative PIC subjects were administrative issues (AI; n = 66, 30.7%), preoperative requirements (n = 43, 20.0%), and cost and insurance (n = 33, 15.0%). The most frequent postoperative PIC subjects were wound care (n = 77, 17.3%), AI (n = 70, 15.0%), activity restrictions (n = 60, 13.5%), drainage (n = 56, 12.6%), and swelling (n = 37, 8.3%). Collectively, older patients (β = 0.234, p = 0.001), those with a history of major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder (2.4 ± 3.0 vs. 1.7 ± 1.9; p = 0.019), and those without postoperative drains (n = 16/17, 94.1% vs. n = 236/334, 70.7%; p = 0.025) engaged in higher levels of PIC. There were no significant associations between other patient characteristics, perioperative details, or complications and PIC frequency. Conclusions: Perioperative PIC is prevalent among the majority of GAM patients at our institution, with age, psychiatric diagnosis, and postoperative drain use identified as significant predictors. To mitigate PIC frequency, it is crucial to ensure adequate support staffing and provide comprehensive postoperative instructions, particularly concerning activity restrictions and drainage management. These interventions may reduce PICs in high-volume centers. Further research should investigate targeted interventions to further support TGNB patients during the perioperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景与目的:乳腺分泌癌是一种少见的乳腺癌组织学亚型。关于这个实体的研究很少,只有一些更大的研究,缺乏共识。我们的目的是报告该亚型中特定的顶腺分泌分化,并考虑该病例的临床结果。病例介绍:我们报告了一名72岁女性患者的病例,该患者到我院就诊,患有可疑的乳腺肿瘤。核心活检和乳房切除术显示低度乳腺癌,一种分泌型亚型,具有大汗腺分化。免疫组织化学证实了肿瘤细胞的分泌性质和大汗腺性质。手术切除被认为是治愈性的,患者正在接受任何复发的长期监测。结论:对分泌性癌伴大汗腺分化的临床行为研究甚少。临床结果未知,不幸的是,除了手术,没有其他辅助治疗显示出疗效.对于这种罕见的实体,需要对长期临床进展进行进一步研究。
    Background and Objectives: Secretory carcinoma of the breast is an uncommon histological subtype of breast cancer. There is little research on this entity and only a few larger studies, which lack consensus. We aim to report a particular apocrine differentiation in this subtype and ponder upon the clinical outcome of this case. Case presentation: We report the case of a 72-year-old female patient who presented to our hospital with a suspicious breast tumor. Core biopsy and mastectomy showed a low-grade breast carcinoma, a secretory subtype with apocrine differentiation. Immunohistochemistry confirmed both the secretory nature and the apocrine nature of the tumor cells. Surgical excision was considered curative and the patient is under long-term surveillance for any recurrences. Conclusions: There is very little research on the clinical behavior of secretory carcinomas with apocrine differentiation. The clinical outcome is unknown and, unfortunately, besides surgery, no other adjuvant treatments have shown efficacy. Further studies on long-term clinical progression are required for this rare entity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)研究背景:乳腺癌是全球范围内的主要恶性肿瘤,在加纳,总体生存率很低。然而,大约50%的病例是早期疾病,随着乳腺癌治疗的进步和生存率的提高,生活质量(QOL)正变得与疾病的治疗一样重要。(2)方法:这是一项对接受保乳手术(BCS)的幸存者的横断面研究,2016年至2020年在加纳的一家三级医院进行的仅乳房切除术(M)和乳房再造乳房切除术(BRS),使用EORTCQLQC-30和EORTCQLQBR-23比较评估他们的生活质量。(3)结果:研究参与者的总体健康状况(GHS)中位数为83.3[IQR:66.7-91.7],手术类型之间没有显着差异。BRS组的功能量表中位数得分较低(82.8和51.0),症状量表得分最高(15.7和16.5)。BRS组的身体图像显着最低(83.3)[68.8-91.7],而BCS组的身体图像最高(100)[91.7-100](p<0.001)。(4)结论:有必要开发专门的支持系统,以改善乳腺癌幸存者的QOL,同时考虑所进行的手术类型。
    (1) Background: Breast cancer is the leading malignancy worldwide, and in Ghana, it has a poor overall survival rate. However, approximately 50% of cases are cases of early-stage disease, and with advances in breast cancer treatment and improvements in survival, quality of life (QOL) is becoming as important as the treatment of the disease. (2) Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study of survivors who had breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy only (M) and mastectomy with breast reconstruction (BRS) from 2016 to 2020 at a tertiary hospital in Ghana, comparatively assessing their QOL using EORTC QLQ C-30 and EORTC QLQ BR-23. (3) Results: The study participants had an overall global health status (GHS) median score of 83.3 [IQR: 66.7-91.7] with no significant differences between the surgery types. The BRS group had statistically significant lower median scores for the functional scale (82.8 and 51.0) and the highest scores for the symptomatic scale (15.7 and 16.5). Body image was significantly lowest for the BRS group (83.3) [68.8-91.7] and highest (100) [91.7-100] for the BCS group (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: There is a need to develop support systems tailored at improving the QOL of breast cancer survivors taking into consideration the type of surgery performed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们介绍了新加坡樟宜总医院乳腺中心淋巴水肿监测策略的主要发现,该策略使用了患者报告的症状,标准臂围测量和临床评估诊断乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)。我们的次要目的是强调和讨论可以实施的监测策略的重要元素,以跟踪乳腺癌治疗的结果指标,以供将来研究使用。
    我们对511名乳腺癌患者进行了一项横断面研究,以评估BCRL的患病率及其相关危险因素。我们根据患者的自我报告定义了BCRL患病率,基于国际淋巴学会(ISL)分期的客观臂围测量和临床诊断。
    患者的中位随访时间为88.8个月。队列中的累积患病率为30.9%。BCRL患者的队列年龄较大(58.4岁与[vs]54.9岁),平均体重指数较高(27.7vs25.2),乳房切除术的比例更高(77%vs64.3%),腋窝间隙,乳房重建的可能性较小,高级别肿瘤,切除更多的淋巴结,更晚期的淋巴结疾病,并接受了辅助化疗。然而,临床上明显的BCRL仅为6.5%(511例患者中有33例).在接受前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)或腋窝采样的患者中,具有临床意义的BCRL的比例为1.7%,而在接受腋窝清除的患者中为9.9%。大多数BCRL的严重程度为亚临床或轻度。
    我们的研究表明,我们的BCRL比率与国际比率相当,并强调了有患病风险的相似患者。拥有全面的淋巴水肿监测策略对于为未来的研究铺平道路至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: We presented the key findings from Singapore\'s Changi General Hospital Breast Centre\'s lymphedema surveillance strategy that used patients\' reported symptoms, standard arm circumference measurements and clinical assessment in the diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Our secondary aim was to highlight and discuss important elements of a surveillance strategy that can be implemented to track this outcome measure of breast cancer treatment for future research.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 511 breast cancer patients to assess the prevalence of BCRL and its associated risk factors. We defined BCRL prevalence rates based on patients\' self-reporting, objective arm circumference measure-ments and clinical diagnosis based on International Society of Lymphology (ISL) staging.
    UNASSIGNED: The median follow-up of patients was 88.8 months. The cumulative prevalence rate in the cohort was 30.9%. The cohort of BCRL patients were older (58.4 versus [vs] 54.9 years), had higher mean Body Mass Index (27.7 vs 25.2), higher proportion of mastectomy (77% vs 64.3%), axillary clearance, less likely breast reconstruction, higher-grade tumour, more lymph nodes excised, more advanced nodal disease, and had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy. However, clinically apparent BCRL was only 6.5% (33 out of 511 patients). The proportion of clinically significant BCRL in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary sampling was 1.7% compared to 9.9% in patients who had undergone axillary clearance. Majority of the BCRL were subclinical or mild in severity.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study showed that our rates of BCRL were comparable to international rates and highlighted similar patient profiles who were at risk of developing the disease. Having a comprehensive lymphedema surveillance strategy is paramount in paving the way for future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    多形性癌(PC)是一种罕见的高级乳腺癌形式,其特征是存在独特的多形性巨大肿瘤细胞,表现出奇异的核和非典型的有丝分裂。在这项研究中,我们报告了3例患者,他们在显微镜下出现了由大型多形性细胞增生组成的病变,其中多核巨细胞占优势。免疫组织化学分析显示,在各个恶性成分中具有不同的免疫学特征。值得注意的是,这份报告旨在提供有价值的见解,增加了对这种罕见肿瘤的理解,伴随着文献综述。尽管它很罕见,由于其独特的形态学和病理学特征,乳腺中的PC仍然具有临床相关性。这些独特的属性需要在临床表现和管理方面进行具体考虑。
    Pleomorphic carcinoma (PC) is an uncommon and high-grade form of breast carcinoma characterized by the presence of distinctive pleomorphic giant tumor cells exhibiting bizarre nuclei and atypical mitosis. In this study, we report three patients who presented with lesions composed of a proliferation of large pleomorphic cells with a predominance of multinucleated giant cells on a microscope. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed distinct immunologic profiles within the respective malignant components. Notably, this report aims to contribute valuable insights, adding to the understanding of this uncommon tumor, accompanied by a literature review. Despite its rarity, PC in the breast remains clinically relevant due to its distinctive morphological and pathological features. These unique attributes require specific considerations in both clinical presentation and management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是比较局部晚期乳腺癌患者的即时乳房重建(IBR)和单独乳房切除术的安全性和有效性结果。
    方法:我们对PUBMED进行了全面的文献检索,EMBASE,和Cochrane数据库。评估的主要结果是总生存率,无病生存,局部复发。次要结果是手术并发症的发生率。所有数据均使用ReviewManager5.3进行分析。
    结果:16项研究,本荟萃分析纳入了15,364名参与者.汇总数据表明,接受IBR的患者比仅接受乳房切除术的患者更容易出现手术并发症(HR:3.96,95CI[1.07,14.67],p=0.04)。总生存率无显著差异(HR:0.94,95CI[0.73,1.20],p=0.62),无病生存率(HR:1.03,95CI[0.83,1.27],p=0.81),或乳腺癌特异性生存率(HR:0.93,95CI[0.71,1.21],IBR组和非IBR组之间的p=0.57)。
    结论:我们的研究表明,乳房切除术后的IBR不影响局部晚期乳腺癌患者的总生存期和无病生存期。然而,IBR带来了不可忽视的更高的并发症风险,需要充分评估和仔细决定。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and mastectomy alone in locally advanced breast cancer patients.
    METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcomes evaluated were overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence. The secondary outcome was the incidence of surgical complications. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.
    RESULTS: Sixteen studies, involving 15,364 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that patients underwent IBR were more likely to experience surgical complications than those underwent mastectomy alone (HR: 3.96, 95%CI [1.07,14.67], p = 0.04). No significant difference was found in overall survival (HR: 0.94, 95%CI [0.73,1.20], p = 0.62), disease-free survival (HR: 1.03, 95%CI [0.83,1.27], p = 0.81), or breast cancer specific survival (HR: 0.93, 95%CI [0.71,1.21], p = 0.57) between IBR group and Non-IBR group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that IBR after mastectomy does not affect the overall survival and disease-free survival of locally advanced breast cancer patients. However, IBR brings with it a nonnegligible higher risk of complications and needs to be fully evaluated and carefully decided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性术后手术疼痛(CPSP)是乳房手术后的常见并发症,在治疗方面提出了挑战。我们假设与安慰剂相比,使用S-氯胺酮在乳房手术后3个月CPSP的发生率会降低。
    方法:参与者被招募并随机分配到S-氯胺酮组(S)或对照组(C)。在S组中,S-氯胺酮以1.5mgkg-1推注给药,然后输注2mgkg-1h-1,而在C组中,以与S-氯胺酮相同的体积和比例给予0.9%盐水安慰剂.主要结果是CPSP的发生率,使用0-10数字评定量表(NRS)测量,术后3个月。
    结果:共纳入72例计划进行乳房切除术的患者(S组,n=33;C组,n=32)。S组术后3个月的CPSP发生率明显低于C组(18.2%vs.48.3%,P<0.05)。两组在中重度疼痛发生率方面无统计学差异。术后静息和运动时疼痛的NRS评分在术后4h和24h显著降低(分别为P<0.05)。与C组相比,S组患者术后1周和3个月的患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)评分较低(分别为P<0.05)。
    结论:S-氯胺酮输注可降低乳腺手术后3个月CPSP的发生率。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic postoperative surgical pain (CPSP) is a frequent complication following breast surgery and poses a challenge in terms of treatment. We hypothesized that the incidence of CPSP would be reduced at 3 months post-breast surgery with the administration of S-ketamine compared to a placebo.
    METHODS: Participants were recruited and randomly assigned to either the S-ketamine group (S) or the control group (C). In group S, S-ketamine was administered as a 1.5 mg kg-1 bolus followed by 2 mg kg-1h-1 infusion, while in group C, a placebo of 0.9% saline was administered in the same volume and rate as S-ketamine. The primary outcome was the incidence of CPSP, measured using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), at 3 months postsurgery.
    RESULTS: A total of 72 patients scheduled for mastectomy were enrolled (group S, n = 33; group C, n = 32). The incidence of CPSP at 3 months postsurgery was significantly lower in group S compared to group C (18.2% vs. 48.3%, P < .05). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in terms of the incidence of moderate to severe pain. NRS scores for postoperative pain at rest and during movement were significantly lower at 4 h and 24 h post-surgery (P < .05, respectively). Patients in Group S had lower Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores at one week and 3 months post-surgery compared to Group C (P < .05, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: S-ketamine infusion reduces the incidence of CPSP 3 months after breast surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管大多数患有BRCA相关乳腺癌的女性选择双侧乳房切除术,目前的指南支持将保乳治疗作为一种选择.随着基因检测适应症的扩大和靶向治疗的出现,在选择保乳的患者人群中,了解保乳治疗的结局非常重要.
    为了描述接受保乳治疗的BRCA相关乳腺癌患者的临床结局,包括同侧和对侧癌症事件的风险以及双侧乳房无切除术生存率。
    这项队列研究在一个单一机构的学术国家综合癌症中心进行,包括172名从前瞻性维护的数据库中确定的具有致病性BRCA1/2变异的女性,从1977年1月1日至2021年12月31日接受保乳治疗。
    比较了BRCA1和BRCA2患者的临床和病理特征,以及总体生存率的估计,双侧乳房无切除术生存率,远处无病生存,患同侧乳腺癌的风险,计算对侧癌症的风险。
    该队列包括172名女性(平均[SD]年龄,47.1[11.7]年),42(24.4%)在40岁之前接受乳腺癌诊断。与BRCA2变异携带者(80[46.5%])相比,BRCA1变异的女性(92[53.5%])在乳腺癌诊断时更年轻,并且倾向于有更晚期的肿瘤,更有可能是激素受体阴性和更高的等级。在11.8年的中位随访时间(IQR,5.7-18.2年),对10年生存率和风险的估计为:总生存率,88.5%(95%CI,83.1%-94.2%);双侧乳房无切除术生存率,70.7%(95%CI,63.3%-78.9%);患侧乳腺癌事件的风险,12.2%(95%CI,5.8%-18.2%);对侧癌症的风险,21.3%(95%CI,13.3%-28.6%)。经过10年的跟踪,风险持续增加。
    在这项队列研究中,尽管接受保乳治疗的患有乳腺癌和致病性BRCA1/2变异的女性发生同侧和对侧乳腺癌事件的风险高于平均水平,大多数患者没有发生其他癌症事件,并且保留双侧乳房切除术.这些发现可能有助于告知BRCA变异的患者选择乳房保护。
    UNASSIGNED: Although most women with BRCA-associated breast cancer choose bilateral mastectomy, current guidelines support breast-conserving therapy as an option. As the indications for genetic testing expand and targeted therapies emerge, understanding the outcomes of breast-conserving therapy in the population of patients choosing breast conservation is important.
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the clinical outcomes of women with BRCA-associated breast cancer who were treated with breast-conserving therapy, including the risks of ipsilateral and contralateral cancer events and bilateral mastectomy-free survival.
    UNASSIGNED: This cohort study conducted at a single-institution academic national comprehensive cancer center included 172 women identified from a prospectively maintained database who had pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and were treated with breast-conserving therapy from January 1, 1977, to December 31, 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical and pathologic characteristics for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 were compared, and estimates of overall survival, bilateral mastectomy-free survival, distant disease-free survival, risk of ipsilateral breast cancer, and risk of contralateral cancer were computed.
    UNASSIGNED: The cohort included 172 women (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [11.7] years), with 42 (24.4%) receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer prior to 40 years of age. Compared with BRCA2 variant carriers (80 [46.5%]), women with BRCA1 variants (92 [53.5%]) were younger at breast cancer diagnosis and tended to have more advanced tumors, which were more likely to be hormone receptor negative and higher grade. At a median follow-up of 11.8 years (IQR, 5.7-18.2 years), estimates of 10-year survival and risk were: overall survival, 88.5% (95% CI, 83.1%-94.2%); bilateral mastectomy-free survival, 70.7% (95% CI, 63.3%-78.9%); risk of an ipsilateral breast cancer event, 12.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-18.2%); and risk of contralateral cancer, 21.3% (95% CI, 13.3%-28.6%). Risks continued to increase after 10 years of follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cohort study, although women with breast cancer and pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants treated with breast-conserving therapy had above-average risks of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer events, most did not have another cancer event and remained bilateral mastectomy free. These findings may be useful for informing patients with BRCA variants choosing breast conservation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号